Iran offers to reopen Hormuz, but Trump points to a post-midterm deal
Tehran ties a phased reopening of the strait to lifting the US blockade, leaving Gulf states and shippers waiting on a Washington that is publicly pressing for isolation.

Iran has offered Washington a phased reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, bundled with a regionwide ceasefire and an end to the US blockade of the country, The National reported on Sept. 24, 2026, citing regional sources.
gCaptain reported on Sept. 22, 2026 that President Donald Trump used the UN General Assembly to call for Iran's complete economic isolation, showing no intention to resume talks there. Set beside that speech, Tehran's roadmap reads as a straight trade: the strait for the blockade. On the public record, the American answer so far is to keep squeezing, which leaves the strait's reopening waiting on Washington's timetable rather than Tehran's.
The National reported on Sept. 24, 2026 that Iran was proposing a regionwide ceasefire of up to 60 days to go with the phased reopening and the end of the blockade. A truce with a ceiling is a holding pattern rather than a settlement. It gives both sides a fixed window to agree on what comes after, and a date on which the pressure returns if they do not.
Aaj English TV reported on Sept. 24, 2026 that Iranian officials had previously indicated the strait could be reopened within seven days if the United States met Tehran's conditions, including lifting its naval blockade of Iranian ports. The link between shipping and the blockade is therefore not new. The roadmap makes it the spine of a wider settlement that also covers the ceasefire.
Aaj English TV reported on Sept. 24, 2026 that Tuesday's discussions began with a meeting between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, followed by talks involving diplomats and experts from both sides. That sequence, senior officials first and technical teams after, looks more like a working session than a courtesy call.
If that meeting went as described, it broke a long silence. Cyprus Mail reported on Sept. 22, 2026 that no face-to-face meetings between Iran and the United States were known to have taken place since July, when an agreement on an interim deal to end the war collapsed weeks after it was signed.
Iran International reported on May 3, 2026 that Iran's peace proposal submitted to the United States via Pakistan aimed to turn the ceasefire into an end to the war within 30 days through a three-stage plan. Staged offers from Tehran are not new, and the interim deal the two sides did sign did not survive the summer.
A less gloomy reading
There is a less gloomy reading, from the same speech. gCaptain reported on Sept. 22, 2026 that Trump said he believed a deal would be done after the US midterm elections in November. On that view, isolation is an opening position, and Tuesday's talks show the channel is working.
Scroll across the figure. Full labels and values are below.
View figure data
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-03 | Iran's peace proposal submitted to the United States via Pakistan |
| 2026-05-07 | Iran was reviewing a United States peace proposal |
| 2026-05-10 | an Iranian response was dismissed |
| 2026-09-22 | call for Iran's complete economic isolation |
| 2026-09-24 | Iran has offered Washington a phased reopening of the Strait of Hormuz |
The public tone has swung fast before. Al Jazeera reported on May 7, 2026 that Iran was reviewing a United States peace proposal that sources said would formally end the war, and carried the upbeat line “We've had very good talks over the last 24 hours” in the same report. Al Jazeera reported on May 10, 2026 that an Iranian response was dismissed in these words: “I don't like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!”
Those swings cut both ways. The roadmap's terms come from regional sources, not from either government on the record, and Washington has made no reply public.
The waterway Iran is bargaining over
Cyprus Mail reported on Sept. 22, 2026 that Trump was due to meet on Tuesday with leaders of the six Gulf Arab states: Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. They share the waterway Iran is bargaining over, and a regionwide ceasefire would cover them as much as it covers Iran.
That schedule put the governments with the most riding on a reopened strait into the same Tuesday as the isolation speech and the first known direct talks since July. Whatever they were told privately, the public signals that day pointed in opposite directions.
Iran pays too. Its ports stay under the naval blockade it wants lifted, and every week spent waiting for November extends that. A strait that opens only in phases suggests Tehran intends to keep some leverage in reserve even after a deal.
A sequence, not a date
Shipowners and traders whose cargoes need the strait carry the rest of the bill for as long as the phased reopening exists only as a proposal. Reopening in stages also means the waterway would not return to normal on the day any deal is signed. Any shipper planning around the offer is planning around a sequence, not a date.
Washington keeps its leverage in the meantime. If the blockade stays on until after the midterms, Trump would negotiate with the vote behind him and the pressure intact. The cost of that patience does not fall mainly on Washington: it runs to Iran's ports, to its Gulf neighbours and to the cargoes that need the strait.
Iran has named its price for reopening Hormuz, and it is the blockade. Until Washington answers on the record, the strait's reopening looks tied less to Tehran's roadmap than to the American election calendar.