Verification ledger
Every published issue stays open to restatement, and every retired candidate stays listed with the step it failed at. Nothing is removed from it.
IssueReading as publishedDeciding observationDateStanding
04
The financing layer carries the obligation neither party discloses.
Reading published; the deciding observation has not yet arrived.
The next scheduled disclosure naming the obligation, from either party.Aug 2026Open03
A shared counterparty concentrates two portfolios no single disclosure reveals.
Reading has held since publication.
No disclosure has named the counterparty from either portfolio; the reading has not been contradicted.Jul 2026Held02
Subsidy incidence falls one tier below the stated target.
Restated after the incidence data broadened.
A later disclosure widened the incidence beyond the single tier first identified.Jun 2026Restated01
A routing precedent outlives the volume that first justified it.
Reading has held since publication.
No reversion in routing has been observed since the volume that prompted it receded.May 2026HeldR1
A counterparty relationship inferred from one filing only.
Retired: never cleared a second confirming source.
Failed at Evidence — one primary document is not two.—RetiredR2
A dependency claim invalidated by later disclosure.
Retired: the falsifying observation arrived before publication.
Failed at Falsification — the stated falsifier was observed before the issue could run.—Retired04 / 06
Publication rate
Published issues over all recorded candidates.
01 / 04
Restatement rate
Published issues later restated.
00 / 04
Withdrawals
Published issues since withdrawn.
Snapshot hash · placeholder. Per-issue snapshot hashing is not yet wired into this ledger; until it is, the dated standing recorded in each row is the audit trail.
Restatement log · issue 02
As published · Jun 2026
Subsidy incidence was read as landing on the manufacturer, one tier above where later data placed it.
Restated · Jul 2026
Incidence data recorded the following month put the benefit one tier below the stated target, at the supplier rather than the manufacturer.
What changed
The tier identified as the incidence point moved down one level, from the manufacturer to its supplier.
What triggered it
A subsequent disclosure of incidence data covering the following reporting period.
Where it appears
The original issue carries a dated correction notice; both readings remain on this ledger.
Dated at the top
The restated version carries the date it changed, not just the date it first ran.
Original preserved
The as-published reading stays on this ledger; nothing is deleted.
Scope named
The notice states exactly what moved — the incidence tier, not the whole finding.
Ledger updated
The standing changes to Restated here, the same day the correction runs.